« Use AI. Comply with the law. Prove it »
CriterIA© is the seal for responsible, criterion-led use of AI. It verifies method and culture against the private CriterIA© methodology — and anchors every issuance on the blockchain.
Take the free CriterIA© 7See the four levels
by EstratégicaMente
CriterIA© · EU AI Act
Complying with the Regulation does not start with a project: it starts by knowing where you stand. The number says how many points are reviewed: seven, twenty-five or sixty.
Self-assessment
To find out whether the rules apply to you and where to begin.
FreeSeven questions
Automated, without human review.
Take the CriterIA© 7Diagnosis
The professional diagnosis: 25 points and your first recommendations.
490 €VAT included
Extended 25-point questionnaire across the six dimensions.
Buy the CriterIA© 25Diagnosis + compliance file
The full diagnosis and your documentary file.
1.500 €VAT included
The six templates: technical documentation, instructions for use, literacy, record of processing activities, TIA and responsibility matrix. Assisted 60-point self-assessment across the six dimensions.
Buy the CriterIA© 60Implementation and seal
We do it, we verify it from the inside and we seal it.
On quotationTailored · Levels II and III
Nobody loses by starting at the bottom. The 490 € of the CriterIA© 25 is deducted in full from the CriterIA© 60 if you buy it within 30 days.
High risk deferred by Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 to December 2027 and August 2028. Transparency (Art. 50) and literacy remain in force.
Verifiable, not decorative
The hash anchors every issuance on the blockchain. Anyone can check issuer, holder, level and date without going through us.
Privacy by design. Only the hash is anchored on the blockchain; personal data stays off-chain, in line with the GDPR.
More than the rules
The Regulation does not go this far. Its Article 4, in the wording in force since 27 July 2026, requires supporting the promotion of AI literacy, without imposing any documentary format or evidence. CriterIA© deliberately goes further: of the seventy-nine points in the rubric, forty-five are EstratégicaMente’s own criteria, thirty-two derive from the Regulation and two are mixed; all eight points of the reskilling pillar are our own. We ask for more because an organisation that does not know how to use AI neither optimises it nor creates value with it, however thick its file.
Own data · source: CriterIA© rubric, 79 points
CriterIA© assesses AI literacy (Art. 4 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689), reskilling and organisational governance for the responsible use of artificial intelligence. It is a private, voluntary methodological seal, aligned with the spirit of the codes of conduct in Art. 95 of the Regulation. What it does verify: that the organisation has method, training and a culture of criterion in its use of AI — verifiably, with every issuance anchored on blockchain.
It does not constitute the EU declaration of conformity or the CE marking provided for in the Regulation, nor does it replace any applicable conformity assessment procedure (Arts. 43-44), and it is not a certification issued by an accredited body.
Pillar · Governance
Governing AI is not about knowing how much technology an organisation uses. It is about knowing where it is used, what for, who is accountable, which risks are accepted and what evidence shows they remain under control.
Without literacy, governance and reskilling, AI is not an advantage: it is a risk. Artificial intelligence does not fail because of the technology: it fails when it enters an organisation that does not know how to use it, has not redesigned its processes to receive it and has no way of deciding who answers for what it produces. In that scenario it saves no work: it multiplies the error, makes it faster and spreads it further.
Literacy. That people know what the tool does, where it fails and when to distrust it. It is not teaching prompt writing: it is teaching people not to believe the answer.
Reskilling. That roles are redesigned around what the person contributes once the machine does the rest. Without this, AI frees no time: it creates confusion and resistance.
Governance. Inventory, risk classification, human oversight with a real ability to intervene, and a record of what was decided and why. Without this there is nothing to show when someone asks.
A law firm tells you whether you comply. We train your team, redesign how you work and then issue our private verification seal. Those are three different things. We applied it at home before any client: we have our consultant network trained with an auditable record, and verification is separated from drafting.
Our clients' data is stored in the European Union (Ireland). Calls to AI models involve a transfer to the United States under standard contractual clauses. Full detail in our AI Policy.
If you use generative AI, four rules: always take a commercial plan with a DPA, never consumer accounts. Check how your provider transfers data.
· DIRECT CONTACT · REPLY IN < 24 H
No hidden newsletter and no sales calls: tell us your case and a person will reply.
CriterIA© 25 · Professional 25-point diagnosis, with report · 490 € VAT included
